Let me address your responses to my emails. First you asked why do businesses fail to fix the problem after being sued. You should research the law of remedies for civil wrongs. Going back 200 years the main remedies for a civil wrong is money. The other remedy is called specific performance - ordering a person or business to do an act or not to an act. The courts disfavor specific performance because it is hard to enforce. Access compliance is a specifiC performance remedy. Therefore, lawyers are not require to obtain access compliance. However, I know most of the lawyers and I know that they have access compliance in all settlement agreements. The truth is the businesses violate the agreement and they get sued again. Kindly, give me a case where a lawyer failed to get a businesS to agree to access compliance.
Second, you state "I don't agree with you.". You failed to analyze my second email. You state there should be a government body to enforce the laws. Actually there two - the U.S. Department of Justice and the state attorney general. These bodies need more tax funds to increase access enforcement. So are you willing to pay more taxes for access enforcement or do you want businesses to pay legal fees for failing to comply. The politicians decided not to increase taxes for government enforcement. Your arguments are emotional and don't addRess how to get businesses to comply without lawyers or how the government body can enforce access lAws wiThout a tax hike. Please respond with sound reasoning based on facts in light of the reluctance of the public to pay more taxes.
No comments:
Post a Comment