Bruce's Reply To Second Opinion - Bruce wants to raise taxes for ADA Enforcement and Stop lawyers from suing

Look, now you're being a nuisance by trying to win an argument. This is not a cross, so stop lawyering.

"First you asked why do businesses fail to fix the problem after being sued."

   No, I never asked that question.

"You should research the law of remedies for civil wrongs."

   You should learn not to lecture people. It's rude.

"Going back 200 years the main remedies for a civil wrong is money."

   Abuse of the recourse is unacceptable. The legal profession does little to address it. Until they do, they can't complain about a public that holds it in contempt.

"The truth is the businesses violate the agreement and they get sued again."

   Maybe it's because they resent lawyers who are perceived to be motivated only by the easy money of a lawsuit.

"Kindly, give me a case where a lawyer failed to get a businesS to agree to access compliance."

   Yuba City, to begin with. That's why they paid the blackmail fee of $15,000, to make the threat of litigation go away. Until perhaps, the next attorney shows up.

   Extortion is not a public business. Someone waves a threat in the face of an individual because the handicapped sticker is an inch too low. The business owner pays him off, he goes away, the stick is unchanged. You're going to tell me this doesn't happen? Try beating the bushes and talking to extorted businesses before you make such a statement.

"You failed to analyze my second email."

   Not really. I just wasn't interested in continuing the conversation. You seem only to be motivated by a conclusion that says, "You're right and everyone else is wrong." I don't care to converse with people lacking the humility required to say, yes, there are lots of examples of where my profession can really suck and something should be done to remedy that.

"you willing to pay more taxes for access enforcement or do you want businesses to pay legal fees for failing to comply."

   Consider how bad it is for the legal profession when, in this Hobson's Choice, one is impelled to choose the government over lawyers. Yes, I would gladly allocate tax dollars to a regulatory agency to keep lawyers out of the process given that the legal profession is pathetic, embarrassing and unconscionable when it comes to regulating itself. If even ONE attorney is carrying out extortionist behavior, that's one too many.

My position on a very specific matter is firm and, I'm convinced, completely justified. Predatory practitioners have no business filing lawsuits and must be exorcised from the legal profession. Until the profession does this, you're going to find yourself on the losing end of a public relations battle on a permanent basis. You are not liked. Only you can fix that.