THEODORE ARTHUR PINNOCK
AKA
ARTHUR CHARLES DAWKINS LEE
Blk 4 Lot 10 Phase 4
Carmona Estates
Carmona
4116 Cavite PHILIPPINES
Phone: 415.513.0859
Fax: (619) 858-3338
http://theodorearthurpinnockjd.blogspot.com
tpinnock62@gmail.com
Abstract
This paper is about the
Ableist's subconscious movement to gut civil rights laws for people with
capabilities (people
with a condition that is different than the majority).
Dependency
I assert that Ableist
financial policies create dependency for people with capabilities. I argue financial
dependency is the underlining reason that human rights for people with
capabilities have failed. The fault of this failure lies with the complacency
and social irresponsibility of people with capabilities and the welfare Ableist.
Republicans Individual
Responsibility And Capability
I assert that the
Republicans have supported independent living through fiscal conservatism,
federalism and liberalism since before the American Civil War. The central
theme behind these concepts is individual responsibility. They supported independent living
for the slaves. The Republicans see people as capable of self-support and
determination with little government aid or intrusion. This ideology includes
people with capabilities.
Long-term Welfare
Charity or private welfare
started before the year 1000 for the blind, deaf and people with physical
differences. The Ableist has supported a safety net through redistribution of
income starting in 1933 and expanded in the 1960's. This safety net was
essential to the independent living movement for people with capabilities.
But now this safety net
public policy costs the taxpayer billions of dollars while making people with
capabilities desirous of avoiding the struggle of the individual and social
responsibility called earning a living.
All things be equal, most
people will accept goods and services for free if given a choice. This is why
in most Holy Texts, God requires people to work for food. God does not give us
food for free to avoid creating dependency and laziness.
However, having a medical
condition can be a seductive reason to justify not working and accepting free
goods and services. But in
most cases the medical condition is not the true the reason for not wanting to
work. The true reason is people, for the most part, would avoid work if they
can obtain free goods and services unless they have a burning desire to
achieve.
In general, I was a
Republican in the 1980's because I am a fiscal conservative. Fiscal
conservatives believe most tax dollars are wasted on government social programs
that make people hate work and make them dependent.
ADA
The seeds of the Americans
With Disabilities Act - ADA germinated during fiscal conservative President
Reagan's administration. The ADA is not the only human rights law for people
with capabilities. The belief was
that our nation could reduce tax dollars for Social Security Income and welfare
by granting civil rights to people with capabilities fostering individual
responsibility, self-help, self-reliance, independence and free market
employment. Reagan believed in promoting the work ethic and entrepreneur spirit
through the free market economy, which would reduce welfare dependency.
President Bush I harvested
Reagan's seeds of independence by passing ADA. The ADA was passed to combat the
enemies of independence:
1. Disability unemployment -
the ADA assumes that the vast majority of people with capabilities are capable
of gainful employment, irrespective of their functional limitations, and that
the primary impediments to their obtaining and maintaining a job are
environmental barriers, such as inaccessible workplaces, and attitudinal
barriers, such as employer prejudice against disability. Experience has
demonstrated that people with very significant functional limitations, such as
high-level quadriplegic and respirator dependence, have been able to work if
given appropriate training and support. However, disability unemployment is at
80%.
2. Environmental barriers -
ADA was intended to remove transportation, service and physical barriers in the
public and private sectors. As of this writing such barriers still existence in
abundance.
3. Altitudinal Barriers -
When ADA was passed the main issue was the manner in which others perceived
with people with capabilities as not "able.” This barrier still exists but
there is a more insidious barrier - the self-dependency welfare barriers. This
barrier requires people with capabilities to prove they are not
"able" so that they qualify for Social Security Income.
The original purpose of
social programs was to provide a short-term safety net while folks develop
skills to work. I benefited from such programs and I became a taxpayer, and not
a tax user in 1989. However, the programs did not require me to work to get
free money. I just had to be poor and disabled. My desire to struggle work was
given to me by my Jamaican Father and Black American Mother.
I contend that most people
desire all the benefits of society without having the burdens of earning the
benefits. God and nature forces us to act to receive benefits. Further, God
makes it difficult to act - the work struggle. Giving away benefits for free
removes the struggle to work unless there is a love of work. So welfare kills
the need to struggle to work.
California Ableist
California Ableist believes
in “helping” the “disabled” through government assistance. This
"helping" paradigm is derived from the ideas of sin, suffering and
charity related to "monsters." Monster Theory included people with physical
or mental differences. Monsters require charity for their sin and suffering.
This help paradigm is ancient and is embedded in the subconscious minds of
people.
So in California human
rights laws for people with capabilities are treated as help laws. In 1968 such
laws were passed then amended to add stringent enforcement provisions. In 2008
and 2012 California started reducing the enforcement provisions. As of this
Article Ableist are attempting to reduce enforcement further. Why?
The reason relates to the
charity rule - no one is required to give help. Human rights lawsuits should
not force people to help the “disabled.”
Conclusion
On April 30, 2012, I freed a
19 year ago girl with one leg. She was locked in subconscious disability mental
slavery. I unlocked the key to her prison. The girl is attractive, hard working
and smart - college material.
On August 11, 2015, she told
me she deliberately became pregnant and she wanted a child without a man or
husband. I was mad. But this was partly my doing. I taught her she had the
right to decide her life. She decided a path I disfavored. The Ableist wants to
take away her right to be single mother with one leg.
No matter how many human
rights laws are passed, people with capabilities will never be freed until we
stop the Ableist subconscious mind.
