Sunday, 30 June 2019
Thursday, 2 August 2018
WE NEED MORE PWD TESTERS TO SUE WEALTHY LANDLORDS: UAAAC AND ITS MEMBERS ARE TESTERS
It
was 1966. John, a Black factory worker, applied to rent a home in a White area.
The landlord refused to rent to him. John sued based on race. David Warren
hated Blacks, the landlord. But he testified he did not refuse to rent to John
because he was Black. John did not win the case.
John
went to the Department of Justice. The Department had a White and Black factory
worker with the same salary apply to rent from Warren. The White was approved.
The Black was denied. The Black person sued. Attorney James said the Black person could not
sue because he never intended to rent from Warren. The Court created Tester
Standing and the Black factory worker won.
A
tester can test if a landlord is complying with the law without any desire to
rent. The tester can bring a lawsuit. This is tester standing.
Courts
have decided that disability groups and their members can be testers for Fair
Housing Act and ADA lawsuits. The UAAAC is a tester based on the laws. Most
people with disabilities are too afraid to sue. Minorities with disabilities
fear that they will suffer the same as Theodore Arthur Pinnock. The White Legal
community tried to crush him. But a person can only destroy herself or himself.
God endowed Theodore Arthur with an unbreakable mind and spirit.
We
need more testers to sue wealthy landlords. Residential secretly hate the
"crippled.". Lawsuits with brave testers reveal the hate.
Below
the UAAAC has provided legal support for being a tester. It will sue any entity
or person saying it is extorting money by filing lawsuits.
Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center v. Hospitality...,
867 F.3d 1093 (2017) decided plaintiffs suing under Title III of the ADA have
“tester standing.” In Havens Realty Corp.
v. Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 372–74, 102 S.Ct. 1114, 71 L.Ed.2d
214 (1982), in which the Supreme Court held that testers have standing to
sue under Sections 804(d) and 812(a) of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. §§
3604(d), 3612(a). The
Court first noted that Section 804(d) prohibits representations “to any
person because of race” that a dwelling is unavailable, when in fact it is
available. Id.
at 373, 102 S.Ct. 1114. The Court reasoned that
Section 804(d) “establishes an enforceable right to truthful information
concerning the availability of housing,” and that an invasion of this right
causes harm that is potentially cognizable under Article III. Id.
at 373–74, 102 S.Ct. 1114. Whereas Congress in Section
804(a) required a “bona fide offer” to rent or purchase before a plaintiff
could sue for discriminatory refusal to sell or rent, it included no such
limitation in Section 804(d). Id.
at 374, 102 S.Ct. 1114. The Court relied on this
absence of limiting language to hold that plaintiffs who “pose as renters or
purchasers for the purpose of collecting evidence of unlawful steering
practices” have standing to sue for violations of Section 804(d). Id.
at 373–75, 102 S.Ct. 1114.
The Ninth Circuit have held that the disabled may assert tester
standing under the FHA. After Havens Realty was
decided, Congress amended the FHA to specifically prohibit discrimination on
the basis of “handicap” in the “terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or
rental of a dwelling.” 42 U.S.C. §
3604(f)(2). Following the reasoning of Havens Realty, the
Ninth Circuit held that tester standing was available under this provision. Smith v. Pac.
Props. & Dev. Corp., 358 F.3d 1097, 1102–04 (9th Cir.
2004). The Ninth Circuit reasoned that, as with the provision at issue
in Havens Realty, § 3604(f)(2) was
by its terms not limited to bona fide purchasers. Id.
at 1104. The Ninth Circuit held that “[i]nterpreting § 3604(f)(2) to
exclude [testers] from enforcing their right to be free from discrimination
undermines the specific intent of the [Fair Housing Act Amendments], which is
to prevent disabled individuals from feeling as if they are second-class
citizens.” Id.
The Ninth Circuit concluded that motivation is irrelevant to the
question of standing under Title III of the ADA.
Wednesday, 1 August 2018
Fake News Targets Black and Asians with cerebral palsy: Response To Elizabeth Wagner's Questions
DRA, DREDEF and other great groups file disability rights
lawsuits. But they get a free pass by the liberal media. Yet the liberal media
targets a minority group and convinced the California to disbar a Black lawyer
with cerebral palsy. Many White lawyers violate the rules but are not
disbarred. The media fabricates fake news.
Question:·
How one becomes a member of the UAAAC.
Answer: Request a membership application via Facebook and
pass membership standards.
Question:·
Whether Mr. Theodore Pinnock intends on moving to California, as specified in
the attached complaint.
Answer: Yes
Question:
Whether members of the UAAAC intend on moving into the dozens of apartment
complexes UAAAC members have filed lawsuits against.
Answer: Members intend to make sure that all members of the
disability community have the equal opportunity to move in to FHAA and ADA
compliant complexes. Members may or may not intend to move in. Members intend
to be FHAA testers to have to right to bring the lawsuits
Question·
Whether the lawsuits meet the spirit of disability rights laws.
Answer: All people have a right to bring valid lawsuits to
enforce civil rights. Since 5000 years ago civilized people created judges to
resolve disputes as opposed to selp help. So the answer is YES!
Question:
The UAAAC’s response to claims that the lawsuits UAAAC members have filed are
tactics to extort money from apartment complexes.
Answer: The UAAAC files valid lawsuits. If NBC makes the
claim that it is engaging in illegal activities or any entity or person make
such a baseless claim the UAAAC will sue them for tort and other remedies.
UAAAC knows other White Disability Groups bring lawsuits.
However, no one ever claims they are engaging in extortion.
Monday, 30 July 2018
To: Wagner, Elizabeth (NBCUniversal)
Thank you for your inquiry. However, the UAAAC questions the motives underneath the inquiry.
We assert the motive is to write
about Theodore Pinnock as a disbarred villain and cultural disability. Cultural
disability refers to a deep subconscious hatred of disability rights because
people believe that people with disabilities needs SSI and charity and not
civil rights.
Way before the UAAAC filed suits,
it did press releases. But only one Black media outlet responded. It has
conducted feeding programs, summer programs, educational programs and more. It
has produced many youtube videos and more. It has given awards to accessible
businesses and more. Yet, the media never covered these stories.
We doubt you were cover the true
facts. However, here they are:
1. In the 1960s the California fair
employment and housing act, which included disability, was passed.
2. In 1988 the Fair Housing Act
Amendments were passed.
3. HUD reports most landlords
refuse to rent to the disabled and refuse reasonable accommodations.
4. We mail and email a request for
reasonable accommodation letter before suing. Most never respond.
5. We survey the site before
suing.
6. Actually, our research shows Bay
Area landlords comply more with the housing laws than LA ones.
7. All housing lawsuits are valid
we filed.
8. Other White controlled
disability groups file lawsuits all the time. The media does not cover
them.
9. Minorities with disabilities are
discriminated against by Whites with or without disabilities.
10. White lawyers use trust funds
for themselves but they are not disciplined unless they are a private
disability rights lawyer.
11. We file housing disability
lawsuits not ADA lawsuits
12. We write letters before
filing.
13. Theodore Pinnock is a member.
He was disbarred on September 21, 2012. He is eligible for reinstatement. We
want him to do so but he refuses due to disability hate.
We know President Trump is correct:
the media is not interested in actual facts.
From the UAAAC Board
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)